Surely, such a situation is primarily caused by the general shift in the Russian science from the methodological monism to pluralism. We are not against the philosophical methodological pluralism but the pluralism with dialectical necessity has two sides and holds internal contradiction, accurately noticed by O.V. Martyshkin: “The pluralism is good when it rests on solid cultural traditions and is coupled with a serious battle of ideas, with polemics, impatience for incompetence and pseudo science, craftsmanship, “self-expression” imposed by the will to become famous or by the deceptive ideas (scientific degrees, positions, honour). Under such conditions, the pluralism leads to improving the level of the scientific statement. Otherwise, the freedom of thought degenerates into the dissoluteness, whateverism and permissiveness, and this leads to decreasing the culture of the research”31.
Only harmonious, well-thought-out, objectively justified research methodology can withstand such a “dissoluteness, whateverism and permissiveness” in the theoretical cognition. With this, in accordance with the fair point of N.N. Tarasov, “the choice of the philosophical grounds and the methodology of the research – is the choice and the responsibility of the scientist”32, and the young scientists need to be taught both.
In that context, the assistance in the development and solving the methodological problems of the civil science and the civil researches is deemed by the authors and the editors of the publication as the top-priority field of their scientific and scientific pedagogical work, that will be continued, in particular, within the framework of the Perm Reading on the Methodological Problems of the Civil Researches, held at the law department of the Perm State National Research University in cooperation with the Kazan Federal University, that have become annual. We invite Doctors of Juridical Sciences and doctoral candidates sensitive on the today’s condition of the methodological theme in the civil law, to participate.
We also hope for the continuation of the mutually beneficial cooperation with our permanent partner – the “Statut” publishing house. We express our appreciation and gratitude on behalf of all the team of the authors for every possible support of our scientific event and for the given opportunity to publish the scientific articles of the participants.
Editors in Charge:
Doctor of Juridical Sciences, Honoured Lawyer of the Russian Federation A.V. Gabov
Doctor of Juridical Sciences, Professor B.G. Golubtsov
Doctor of Juridical Sciences, Professor O.A. Kuznetsova
I. Статьи специально приглашенных докладчиков
О мировоззренческом аспекте методологии гражданского права
УДК 347
В.В. Зайцев
Доктор юридических наук, профессор, заслуженный юрист РФ, заместитель заведующего кафедрой правового обеспечения рыночной экономики
Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте РФ
119571, Россия, г. Москва, пр. Вернадского, 82, стр. 1
ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5299-3938
ResearcherID: M-3964-2016
E-mail: 7732371@gmail.com
В.А. Рыбаков
Доктор юридических наук, профессор, ведущий научный сотрудник Научного центра экономического правосудия
Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте РФ
119571, Россия, г. Москва, пр. Вернадского, 82, стр. 1
ORCID: 0000-0003-0783-7359
ResearcherID: M-3991-2016
E-mail: rva945@yandex.ru
Введение: активно насаждаемый в последние годы методологический плюрализм привел к методологическому хаосу в цивилистических исследованиях. Особую опасность представляют попытки замены диалектического материализма на идеализм, в ходе которых поднимается вновь проблема соотношения бытия и сознания, базиса и надстройки.